UN envoy Christopher Ross on Western Sahara
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your feedback | Share71
Christopher Ross, Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara
Interview with Christopher Ross, Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara
25 January 2012 – In January 2009 Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon appointed Christopher Ross as his Personal Envoy for Western Sahara, a territory that has been under dispute for several decades. Fighting erupted there in 1976 between Morocco and the Polisario Front following the Spanish colonial administration’s withdrawal. The violence quickly drove hundreds of thousands of Saharawi refugees to flee across the border and into neighbouring Algeria, where they remain to this day.
Almost two decades later, the violence has subsided but both parties are still at odds despite ongoing UN-mediated talks. While Morocco supports autonomy for the Saharawis, the Polisario Front says the territory’s final status should be decided in an independence referendum.
Mr. Ross, a former United States diplomat with a long and distinguished career, says in the interview that it is high-time to end the Western Sahara conflict and the human tragedy that it has engendered.
UN News Centre: What is the conflict in the Western Sahara all about?
Christopher Ross: Well, as you know the Western Sahara is a former Spanish colony, roughly the size of Great Britain but with a population of just a few hundred thousand. Its legal status has been in dispute since well before the Spanish withdrawal in 1975-76. The parties to this dispute currently are the Kingdom of Morocco and the Polisario Front. Morocco, which has controlled most of Western Sahara since the 1970s, insists that the Western Sahara must become an autonomous part of Morocco on the basis of negotiations with the Polisario and a yes/no referendum.
The Polisario, for its part, argues that the people of Western Sahara must be free to choose their own future through a referendum that includes the option of independence. From 1975 to 1991 there were open hostilities between these two parties, heavy fighting, but in 1991 a ceasefire was implemented as part of a UN-led settlement effort. It should be noted that while this is no longer a fighting war, it is still a tense and dangerous situation. The UN continues to work to encourage a settlement and to improve the well-being of the people whose lives have been tragically affected.
It’s not enough to keep talking on the basis of fixed positions; the solution must reflect a political will and concrete steps to move.
UN News Centre: So, what is the UN doing?
Christopher Ross: Well, since the mid-1980s the UN has taken two distinct approaches to this conflict under the guidance of the Security Council. The first, which lasted until 2004, was based on several settlement plans that were put forward to the parties for their approval. None of these settlement plans worked. They all called for a referendum but the parties were never able to agree who would be eligible to vote. In 2004, a second phase began and this phase continues to this day. This one is based on direct negotiations between the parties. In resolutions every year, the Security Council has called on the parties to achieve, and here I must quote, “a just, lasting, and mutually acceptable political solution, which will provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara.” […] To assist the parties in making progress, the Secretary-General has appointed a Personal Envoy to act as a mediator and facilitator.
So, to summarize, the Security Council now expects the parties themselves to negotiate a political solution with the help of the UN, with the help of the neighbouring States, with the help of the international community and to do so instead of reacting to settlement plans others have drawn up.
In the context of this new phase, in April 2007, the two parties put forward their proposals for a settlement of the conflict to the Security Council, and ever since then these have formed the basis for discussion. I should note that these political efforts to foster a settlement are not the only forms of UN involvement. The UN family has been active on several fronts. It has provided vital support to the thousands of refugees who fled into Algeria to escape the fighting between Morocco and the Polisario in the 1970s.
Separated families meet up again during a family visit in Western Sahara. Photo: UNHCR/S.Hopper
It has worked to implement confidence-building measures to facilitate the return of the refugees once a settlement is reached. It has also maintained a small peacekeeping force in Western Sahara known as MINURSO, the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara. And, finally, it has taken an increased interest in human rights as the parties to the conflict have increasingly accused each other of serious violations of these rights.
UN News Centre: What about the human dimension to this ongoing conflict?
Christopher Ross: Unfortunately, the demands of burning issues around the world and the absence of imminent crisis in Western Sahara have worked to deprive this conflict of the attention it deserves from the international community. But a settlement is, in fact, long overdue not least because of its human dimension. Ensuring a safe return of the Sahrawi refugees in Algeria to their homes under honourable conditions has been my highest objective. I first visited the refugee camps in the 1970s. I returned there beginning in 2009 and I found, much to my dismay, little had changed.
It is unacceptable, in my view, that for 37 years, these refugees have lived in miserable conditions because of a political dispute whose main actors have engaged in endless battles on the ground, at the negotiating table, in international fora. And I think we should never lose site of the people caught in the middle of this conflict.
UN News Centre: Why is this proving so difficult to solve? Why is it taking so long?
Christopher Ross: Essentially, the two sides have maintained positions that are mutually exclusive and neither has been willing to yield one inch. Polisario continues to insist that the final status of Western Sahara must be determined by its people; Morocco continues to insist that the only possible solution is an agreed autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty.
The Security Council has been encouraging the parties to negotiate and has refrained from considering imposing a solution. So, as matters stand, each party is free to reject the proposal of the other as the basis of negotiations. And this is partly a reflection of the fact that each party is convinced that its position is well grounded in history and in international law and enjoys significant domestic and international support. So, they go on maintaining their positions without entering into a genuine negotiating process.
UN News Centre: So, what can you do as the UN mediator to move this process forward?
Christopher Ross: Well, my role as Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General is to promote a settlement by first providing a framework for dialogue and, second, by encouraging genuine negotiations without myself taking a position on the substance. I cannot force a solution on the parties; they themselves must work it out with my help and that of others.
Now, when I first took on these duties, we suspended formal negotiations that had been taking place earlier with large delegations and preferred, instead, to convene informal talks with smaller delegations. This was because the formal negotiations that had gone on had resulted in little more than very strong polemics. We were determined to foster an atmosphere of respect in which much more fluid negotiations and discussions could occur. This effort succeeded but it wasn’t enough to break the impasse. And the two parties simply could not move beyond their two proposals. So, what we have done more recently is try to break down these proposals into individual topics that the parties might be able to discuss without prejudice to whatever the final status might be and they’ve agreed that they could begin by discussing natural resources and demining and then moving on to other subjects. But it really remains to be seen whether this approach will, in fact, lead to movement on the core issue.
UN News Centre: And what will happen if a political solution isn’t found?
Christopher Ross: Well, the fact is that the absence of a solution has imposed growing risks and costs for the parties, the Maghreb region, and for the international community.
The risks for the parties include the possible renewal of military hostilities, the possible outbreak of popular unrest, and the possible recruitment of frustrated young and unemployed Sahrawis into terrorist or criminal groups. The costs include the humanitarian plight of the refugees, increasing questions about human rights, the expense of maintaining significant military forces, and an inability to plan for the use of the natural resources of Western Sahara in a proper way.
Now, for the region and the international community there is the risk of military escalation and there is the possibility of increased terrorist and criminal activity. There, too, there are costs. Among the costs are a failure to achieve the benefits of greater economic integration and the absence of full coordination in responding to threats of terrorism and crime which, in fact, have grown since the collapse of the [Muammar] al-Qadhafi regime and the dispersal of arms and fighters into the Sahel region.
Map of Western Sahara. Please click for a larger more detailed version. Credit: UN Cartographic Section
UN News Centre: Do you think a settlement can be reached?
Christopher Ross: Well, there are some people who think that the Western Sahara conflict really is not ripe for settlement on terms acceptable to the parties and to the international community. But it’s clear that a settlement is needed if the Maghreb region is to move forward to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Now, it’s possible that recent developments may encourage the parties to begin a more serious process of negotiation. We’ve had the Arab Spring. We’ve had increasing signs of disaffection among youth. We’ve had recent and forthcoming elections in several places. We’ve had a desire to revive movement toward Maghreb unity. And we’ve seen a growing awareness of the threat of terrorism. So, these and other developments may push the parties to substantive engagement and may also prompt the key regional and international players to become more active in the search for a settlement.
We, for our part, are going to continue our efforts to promote a genuine negotiating process. And the next round of informal talks is scheduled for February at the Greentree Estate in Long Island.
UN News Centre: Is there anything the international community can do to help out?
Christopher Ross: Well, indeed. I think there are things to be said not only to the parties but to the countries in the neighbourhood and to the international community. For the parties, we hope to see a much greater engagement on the core issue of the future status of Western Sahara in the course of the coming year. It’s not enough to keep talking on the basis of fixed positions; the solution must reflect a political will and concrete steps to move. We also hope that the people of Western Sahara, whether they be in the territory or in the refugee camps, will enjoy full human rights, including the freedom to express their views on their future and that the negotiators will take these views into account.
For the States of the Maghreb and the wider international community, we hope that they will see more clearly than ever the benefits for all parties concerned of actively helping to find a mutually acceptable solution.
After 37 years, it’s high-time to end the Western Sahara conflict and the human tragedy that it has engendered.
Friday, January 27, 2012
Wednesday, December 07, 2011
Moroccan authorities behind the destruction of mores than 40 wodden cabins In amigriou Area belonging to Saharawi Natives.
أحتج عشرات المواطنين الصحراويين أمام مقر عمالة الطرفاية ،وذالك بعد أن قامت السلطات المحلية بهدم عشرات لبراريك يوم الثلاثاء 16 نوفبمر مساءا في منطقة جنوب قرية الصيد انكيرو 8 كلم ،ويبلغ عدد لبراريك التي تم هدمها 40 براكة تعود ملكيتها لمواطنين صحراويين منذو العهد الإسباني ،،وكان المواطنين الصحراويين قد تفاجئوا بهذا الإجراء الذي قامت بيه السلطات دون سابق إنذار ،فيما لم تتخذ السلطات أي إجراء ضد براريك أخري قريبة من نفس المكان تعود ملكيتها لمواطنين منحدرين من الشمال ،
وإحتجاجا على هذا الإجراء نظم المتضررين العديد من وقفة أم عمالة الطرفاية محتجين على الإجراءات العنصرية ومصادرة الحقوق التي يقودها رئيس دائرة الطرفاية وقائد الدرك ،حيث جوبهوا بالتهديد المباشر من طرف عشرات رجال السلطة الذي حاصروا الوقفة ،
يؤكد بعض المحتجين أن هذا الإجراء الذي قامت بيه السلطات مرتبط بوجود شركات للتنقيب عن النفط في تلك المنطقة ، فيما يؤكد أخرين وجود محاولة من السلطات إلي بيع هذه الأراضي لجهات أجنبية تحاول إستغلال هذه المنطقة في مشاريع سياحية على حساب السكان الأصليين.
يذكر أنه بعد تهديم لبراريك وصلت قوات من الجيش وصادرت أوراق سيارات المحتجين وأتهموا المحتجين بمحاولة إنشاء ظروف تكوين مخيم أكديم إزيك 2 ،وإلي حدود الساعة ترفض السلطات فتح حوار مع المحتجين بدون حجة واضحة
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
وصية المعتقلين السياسيين في سحن سلا المغربية
لا تصالح
عندما يملأ الحق قلبك
لا تصالح ولو قيل ما قيل من كلمات السلام
لا تصالح وأرو قبلك بالدم
و أرو التراب المقدس
و أرو أسلافك الراقدين
إلى أن ترد عليك العظام
شعبنا الباسل, أمهاتنا الطاهرات, أبنائنا الشامخين, أخواتنا العفيفات, إخواننا الأمجاد رفاقنا الضراغم
سلام عليكم جميعا, نكتب لكم وصيتنا هاته ونحن على مشارف الشهادة في يومنا 30 من معركة الكرامة والشرف لنقول لكم :
أمهاتنا الطاهرات هذه قبلة حب أبدية نطبعها على جباهكم المرفوعة دهرا تمتزج بدمعة شوق وحنين ذرفتها العين في لحظة احتضار تختزلان كل المساحات والأزمنة من أجل البوح بمشاعر استحالت أمواج عاتية تتلاطم على شاطئ القلب لتنثر رذاذ عطر منبعث من ذكريات خالدة نعيد شريط وقائعها فتستوقفنا فيه تضحياتكم الجسام من أجلنا بسهركم وصبركم وتجلدكم, تحملتن الألم من أجل الأمل الذي عقدتموه فينا كنتن تفرحن عندما نفرح وتمرضن لحظة مرضنا أرضعتمونا حتى ارتوين واحتضنتمونا بدفء رائع, كانت أحشائكم المدرسة الأولى التي تلقينا أبجديات الثورة وحروف الوطن ومعاني النيل و التضحية والاستبسال عانيتن وبمرارة و أنتن تنتظرون لساعات وأيام طوال أمام المخافر و المعتقلات. أنها تضحيات استثنائية تفوق طاقة البشر ونحن نستحضرها الآن تجتاحنا أحاسيس عارمة تمزق الفؤاد لوعة وحنينا وتعصف بالكيان والوجدان وأمام هذا الحمل الثقيل الذي يلزمنا انطلاقا من وازع فطري ووجداني وأخلاقي يرد الجميل و الضيع, هنا نحن أمهاتنا الغاليات نفي بعهدنا لكن وللشهداء ونختار الموت البطيء ولكن بشرف وعز وتحدي وكبرياء الألم لتنتشوا بزغرودة نصر تطلقونها مخترقة لعنان السماء من أجل تمتيعكم بوضع اعتباري ومكانة رمزية كأمهات شهداء, فجزاكم الله عنا خيرا وصبرا صبرا موعدنا الجن إنشاء الله أبائنا الشامخين شموخ جبال هذا الوطن و المبجلين بتاج الهبة والوقار ونحن أبنائكم البررة الراسخون ثباتا وإباء من قلب الأقبية و السجون ونخط لكم من على فراش الموت ونحن نحتضر كلماتنا الأخيرة بمداد دم تأريخا للذكرى و حفظا للتاريخ لننحني باعتزاز وشموخ إجلالا لهاماتكم السابحة في بحور المجد... أنتم المدرسة والملهم أنتم ركام التجارب والقدوة والمعلم الذي يلقننا دروس الثورة وتعاليم المقاومة أنتم من قال لنا لا تصالح ولو منحوك الذهب أنتم من أخبرنا أن للحرية الحمراء باب بكل يد مدرجة تدق وأن ولائنا أولا وأخيرا يجب أن يكون للوطن و للوطن وحده, سرنا على نهجكم السديد وخطكم الثوري الملتزم نرجى إلى شمس ساطعة إلى غد قادم بزحف فيه الأخضر على بيادر القحط والبأس غد تزحف فيه الحرية على قلاع القهر و الاستعمار.
ووفاءنا لعهدكم وإنصافا لتضحياتكم كابدنا وقاسينا وعانينا جبروت العدو وسيادته بأنفة وإباء لنجسد واقعيا وميدانيا تعاقب الأجيال في أرقى صوره ولنكمل حلمكم المشروع وتطلعكم التاريخي نحو الإنعتاق لم نجد ما نتوج به هذه المسيرة الحافلة سوى أن نسترخص أنفسنا قرابين على مذبح الحرية شهداء عند ربنا نحسب فهنيئا لنا بكم وهنيئا لكم بنا وعوضكم الله وجزاكم عنا خيرا وصبر وصبر ميعادنا الجنة إنشاء الله.
إخواتنا العفيفات, إخواننا الأماجد
لا تصالح على الدم ... حتى الدم
لا تصالح ولو قيل رأس برأس
أكل الرؤوس سواء؟.
أقلب الغريب كقلب أخيك..؟. أعيناه عينا أخيك و هل تساوي يد سيفها كان لك... بيد سيفها أثكلك أمه قانون المراق هدار يرسم جغرافيا القهر الممتد على طول خارطة الوطن الجريح إنها تعاويذ البقاء الأبدي يرتلها الجسد المنهك النحيل وقلب يتراقص ألما على ‘إيقاع نغماته الأخيرة في سباق العمر... قبل الرحيل إلى جنان الخلد... أنها وصية تحوي في طياتها عهدا يحب الوفاء ودربا تلزمه الاستمرارية وثأرا مشتعلا في الأضلع ووطنا يسكن فينا سنين عجاف من العبودية و الاحتلال, هذا ميثاق بيننا وبينكم فصنوه و أحملوه دمعة من أعينكم لا تذرف إلا يوم يرفرف العلم الوطني خفاقا في فعيوننا الحبيبة حرة ومستقلة فلا مجال للبكاء الاتشاح بالسواد فالموت شرف هو مدعاة للفخر واستنهاض للهمم وحشدنا لمسايرة مسيرة التحرر الوطني والرقي بها تجربة عالمية فريدة تستلهم منها باقي الشعوب عبر التضحية والفداء فاجعلوها براكين وحمما تشهد على إندحار أخر جندي غازي لأرضنا العزيزة.
لا تصالح
فليس سوء أن تريد.
أنت فارس هذا الزمان الوحيد
وسواك... الممسوخ
شعبنا الباسل.
في هذا الزمن الردى حين يصبح الموت من مفردات الحياة تتكالب قوى الظلم و الطغيان على شعب أعزل إلى من إرادته فتنصب المشانق وتقيم حفلات القصاص الظالم, لكل صوت يسبح ضد التيار المتجبر إنها تراجيديا مظلمة ومأساة مفجعة, لكن بقدرة قادر وبتضحية مضحي وبدم شهيد وألم جريح ودموع ...
تتساقط أوراق التوت تباعا ليتعرى وجه النمر الورقي القبيح ويصبر الصوت السابح إعصارا مدمر يقض مضاجع الاحتلال ويزلزلها وتصبح حتمية النصر أمرا معاشا وواقع لا يمكن تجازوه تأطره معطيات الميدان, أي الانتفاضة كصيغة نضالية مفتوحة في بعدها الجماهيري الزاخر بالنضج والعطاء لتتوالى قوافل الشهداء و المعتقلين و المخطوفين و الجرحى و المعطوبين وتندلع في الأفق تباشير الحرية مع بزوغ كل فجر وتلوح أشعة الاستقلال تتربع في كبد السماء, وإيمانا منا أن البطولة تقتضي أن نمد أجسادنا جسورا, فقل لرفقائنا أن يعبروا, وهنا نحن اليوم شعبنا الأصيل نروي تراب الصحراء الطاهرة بدماء زكية ونصرخ ملء حناجرنا بكل عنفوان ثوري لنقول لا في وجه من قال نعم, لا للذل لا للخضوع لا للخنوع ونكتب لا بالدم و الروح ليشهد التاريخ على برنا بالوطن هذه هي فلسفة الكفاح الوطني وقوامه ننشد من خلالها الخلود وأملنا الالتحاق بركب الخالدين شهداء الوطن وهدفنا من وراء هذه التضحية أن نكون وقودا يشعل نارا حارقة تأتي على أخضر العدو ويابسه دعما لكل الآمال ولا تنتظر جزاءا ولا شكورا فهذا واجب وطني يمليه علينا ضمير متقد وحي ولكن ما ننتظر منكم ونوصيكم به نوجزه في هذه الأبيات الناطقة بلسان حالنا في ساعات الاحتضار هاته :
أيها الواقفون على حافة المذبحة
أشهروا الأسلحة
سقط الموت وانفرط القلب كالمسبحة
الدم انساب فوق الوشاح
المنازل أضرحة...الزنازين أضرحة...المدى أضرحة...
فارفعوا الأسلحة و أتبعوني
أنا ندم الغد و البارحة
رايتي عظمتان و جمجمة
وشعاري الصباح
المعتقلين السياسيين الصحراويين
مجموعة أكديم إزيك المضربين عن الطعام
بسجن سلا2
29 نوفمبر2011
عندما يملأ الحق قلبك
لا تصالح ولو قيل ما قيل من كلمات السلام
لا تصالح وأرو قبلك بالدم
و أرو التراب المقدس
و أرو أسلافك الراقدين
إلى أن ترد عليك العظام
شعبنا الباسل, أمهاتنا الطاهرات, أبنائنا الشامخين, أخواتنا العفيفات, إخواننا الأمجاد رفاقنا الضراغم
سلام عليكم جميعا, نكتب لكم وصيتنا هاته ونحن على مشارف الشهادة في يومنا 30 من معركة الكرامة والشرف لنقول لكم :
أمهاتنا الطاهرات هذه قبلة حب أبدية نطبعها على جباهكم المرفوعة دهرا تمتزج بدمعة شوق وحنين ذرفتها العين في لحظة احتضار تختزلان كل المساحات والأزمنة من أجل البوح بمشاعر استحالت أمواج عاتية تتلاطم على شاطئ القلب لتنثر رذاذ عطر منبعث من ذكريات خالدة نعيد شريط وقائعها فتستوقفنا فيه تضحياتكم الجسام من أجلنا بسهركم وصبركم وتجلدكم, تحملتن الألم من أجل الأمل الذي عقدتموه فينا كنتن تفرحن عندما نفرح وتمرضن لحظة مرضنا أرضعتمونا حتى ارتوين واحتضنتمونا بدفء رائع, كانت أحشائكم المدرسة الأولى التي تلقينا أبجديات الثورة وحروف الوطن ومعاني النيل و التضحية والاستبسال عانيتن وبمرارة و أنتن تنتظرون لساعات وأيام طوال أمام المخافر و المعتقلات. أنها تضحيات استثنائية تفوق طاقة البشر ونحن نستحضرها الآن تجتاحنا أحاسيس عارمة تمزق الفؤاد لوعة وحنينا وتعصف بالكيان والوجدان وأمام هذا الحمل الثقيل الذي يلزمنا انطلاقا من وازع فطري ووجداني وأخلاقي يرد الجميل و الضيع, هنا نحن أمهاتنا الغاليات نفي بعهدنا لكن وللشهداء ونختار الموت البطيء ولكن بشرف وعز وتحدي وكبرياء الألم لتنتشوا بزغرودة نصر تطلقونها مخترقة لعنان السماء من أجل تمتيعكم بوضع اعتباري ومكانة رمزية كأمهات شهداء, فجزاكم الله عنا خيرا وصبرا صبرا موعدنا الجن إنشاء الله أبائنا الشامخين شموخ جبال هذا الوطن و المبجلين بتاج الهبة والوقار ونحن أبنائكم البررة الراسخون ثباتا وإباء من قلب الأقبية و السجون ونخط لكم من على فراش الموت ونحن نحتضر كلماتنا الأخيرة بمداد دم تأريخا للذكرى و حفظا للتاريخ لننحني باعتزاز وشموخ إجلالا لهاماتكم السابحة في بحور المجد... أنتم المدرسة والملهم أنتم ركام التجارب والقدوة والمعلم الذي يلقننا دروس الثورة وتعاليم المقاومة أنتم من قال لنا لا تصالح ولو منحوك الذهب أنتم من أخبرنا أن للحرية الحمراء باب بكل يد مدرجة تدق وأن ولائنا أولا وأخيرا يجب أن يكون للوطن و للوطن وحده, سرنا على نهجكم السديد وخطكم الثوري الملتزم نرجى إلى شمس ساطعة إلى غد قادم بزحف فيه الأخضر على بيادر القحط والبأس غد تزحف فيه الحرية على قلاع القهر و الاستعمار.
ووفاءنا لعهدكم وإنصافا لتضحياتكم كابدنا وقاسينا وعانينا جبروت العدو وسيادته بأنفة وإباء لنجسد واقعيا وميدانيا تعاقب الأجيال في أرقى صوره ولنكمل حلمكم المشروع وتطلعكم التاريخي نحو الإنعتاق لم نجد ما نتوج به هذه المسيرة الحافلة سوى أن نسترخص أنفسنا قرابين على مذبح الحرية شهداء عند ربنا نحسب فهنيئا لنا بكم وهنيئا لكم بنا وعوضكم الله وجزاكم عنا خيرا وصبر وصبر ميعادنا الجنة إنشاء الله.
إخواتنا العفيفات, إخواننا الأماجد
لا تصالح على الدم ... حتى الدم
لا تصالح ولو قيل رأس برأس
أكل الرؤوس سواء؟.
أقلب الغريب كقلب أخيك..؟. أعيناه عينا أخيك و هل تساوي يد سيفها كان لك... بيد سيفها أثكلك أمه قانون المراق هدار يرسم جغرافيا القهر الممتد على طول خارطة الوطن الجريح إنها تعاويذ البقاء الأبدي يرتلها الجسد المنهك النحيل وقلب يتراقص ألما على ‘إيقاع نغماته الأخيرة في سباق العمر... قبل الرحيل إلى جنان الخلد... أنها وصية تحوي في طياتها عهدا يحب الوفاء ودربا تلزمه الاستمرارية وثأرا مشتعلا في الأضلع ووطنا يسكن فينا سنين عجاف من العبودية و الاحتلال, هذا ميثاق بيننا وبينكم فصنوه و أحملوه دمعة من أعينكم لا تذرف إلا يوم يرفرف العلم الوطني خفاقا في فعيوننا الحبيبة حرة ومستقلة فلا مجال للبكاء الاتشاح بالسواد فالموت شرف هو مدعاة للفخر واستنهاض للهمم وحشدنا لمسايرة مسيرة التحرر الوطني والرقي بها تجربة عالمية فريدة تستلهم منها باقي الشعوب عبر التضحية والفداء فاجعلوها براكين وحمما تشهد على إندحار أخر جندي غازي لأرضنا العزيزة.
لا تصالح
فليس سوء أن تريد.
أنت فارس هذا الزمان الوحيد
وسواك... الممسوخ
شعبنا الباسل.
في هذا الزمن الردى حين يصبح الموت من مفردات الحياة تتكالب قوى الظلم و الطغيان على شعب أعزل إلى من إرادته فتنصب المشانق وتقيم حفلات القصاص الظالم, لكل صوت يسبح ضد التيار المتجبر إنها تراجيديا مظلمة ومأساة مفجعة, لكن بقدرة قادر وبتضحية مضحي وبدم شهيد وألم جريح ودموع ...
تتساقط أوراق التوت تباعا ليتعرى وجه النمر الورقي القبيح ويصبر الصوت السابح إعصارا مدمر يقض مضاجع الاحتلال ويزلزلها وتصبح حتمية النصر أمرا معاشا وواقع لا يمكن تجازوه تأطره معطيات الميدان, أي الانتفاضة كصيغة نضالية مفتوحة في بعدها الجماهيري الزاخر بالنضج والعطاء لتتوالى قوافل الشهداء و المعتقلين و المخطوفين و الجرحى و المعطوبين وتندلع في الأفق تباشير الحرية مع بزوغ كل فجر وتلوح أشعة الاستقلال تتربع في كبد السماء, وإيمانا منا أن البطولة تقتضي أن نمد أجسادنا جسورا, فقل لرفقائنا أن يعبروا, وهنا نحن اليوم شعبنا الأصيل نروي تراب الصحراء الطاهرة بدماء زكية ونصرخ ملء حناجرنا بكل عنفوان ثوري لنقول لا في وجه من قال نعم, لا للذل لا للخضوع لا للخنوع ونكتب لا بالدم و الروح ليشهد التاريخ على برنا بالوطن هذه هي فلسفة الكفاح الوطني وقوامه ننشد من خلالها الخلود وأملنا الالتحاق بركب الخالدين شهداء الوطن وهدفنا من وراء هذه التضحية أن نكون وقودا يشعل نارا حارقة تأتي على أخضر العدو ويابسه دعما لكل الآمال ولا تنتظر جزاءا ولا شكورا فهذا واجب وطني يمليه علينا ضمير متقد وحي ولكن ما ننتظر منكم ونوصيكم به نوجزه في هذه الأبيات الناطقة بلسان حالنا في ساعات الاحتضار هاته :
أيها الواقفون على حافة المذبحة
أشهروا الأسلحة
سقط الموت وانفرط القلب كالمسبحة
الدم انساب فوق الوشاح
المنازل أضرحة...الزنازين أضرحة...المدى أضرحة...
فارفعوا الأسلحة و أتبعوني
أنا ندم الغد و البارحة
رايتي عظمتان و جمجمة
وشعاري الصباح
المعتقلين السياسيين الصحراويين
مجموعة أكديم إزيك المضربين عن الطعام
بسجن سلا2
29 نوفمبر2011
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
Western Sahara: Keeping the Status Quo
Western Sahara: Keeping the Status Quo
October 1, 2011 9:30 amadmin0 Comments
Resolution 1979 (2011) regarding the Western Sahara
Since December 2010, the so-called international community watches, unmoved, by the popular uprisings that have taken place in the Arab world. In the midst of a global economic crisis, these uprisings – hitherto unimaginable and unimagined – are the result of the desperation of societies in the face of entrenched corruption and the authoritarianism of regimes founded on oligarchies that seized power during their independence. Nevertheless, the revolutionary outbreak owes, without doubt, its rapid local and regional propagation to the expansion of communication amongst the youth (via Internet networks), which breaks the iron silence of information upon which such regimes were founded. The first achievement of this “Arab Spring” was the deposition of Ben Ali in Tunis. The trigger of his demise was the self-immolation of a young man haunted by his own future and the constant arrogance and humiliation of the regime.
However, the first warning signs of this tide of demonstrations took place in early October 2010, several thousand kilometres from the Mediterranean, in the extreme South-western point of the Arab world, in El-Aaiun – the capital of Western Sahara. Prohibited from demonstrating peacefully in the city streets, thousands of Sahrawis, dodging Moroccan occupation forces, pitched their tents in Gdeim Yzik – the middle of the desert – and protested for their lack of work and housing, and demanding their rights to sovereignty over the natural resources of their territory.
The Moroccan monarchy, overwhelmed by the magnitude of the events and the deterioration of its international image, reacted, making use of what has become a classic formula: first, expulsion of the international press to avoid uncomfortable testimonials, followed by the assault on and destruction of the encampment on November 8, 2011, followed by the detention, and disappearance of opposition leaders without due process. But this time, some members of the Moroccan Security Forces died along with protesters.
The young Sahrawis who lived in the zone of Western Sahara that is occupied by the Moroccans – desperate after waiting for a referendum allowing them to freely choose their future for more than 35 years – had lost the fear to die and faced the occupier, brandishing kitchen knives.[1] Meanwhile, in the Algerian refugee camps, the Polisario Front[2] (the Sahrawi Liberation Movement) had to calm its own, also desperate group that threatened to break the ceasefire and intervene on behalf of their brothers.
The Polisario – another oligarchy in power since the foundation of the Movement in 1972 – preferred to offer a new opportunity in the framework of negotiations established by the United Nations. They hoped that their gesture of good faith would be rewarded at the next Security Council resolution which reviews the conflict annually and would include the protection of human rights desired by MINURSO[3] – the sole UN peace mission without competencies in human rights.
Recall that Western Sahara is, according to the UN, “a non-autonomous territory,” that is to say, a colonial territory still awaiting decolonisation. In October 1975, the International Tribunal in The Hague rejected any and all sovereign rights of Morocco and Mauritania over the territory.[4] However, Spain – the administrative legal power – just a few days later, signed a treaty[5] with Morocco and Mauritania ceding administration and thus abandoning its responsibilities. Those agreements were never endorsed by the General Assembly and thus lack all legal effect at the international level. Confirmed by a UN legal report in 2002,[6] Morocco and Mauritania became the occupying powers of the Western Sahara in 1976 with the consent of Spain since it was the previous administrating power.
The war that ensued between the occupiers and the Polisario Front initially led to the defeat of Mauritania in 1979, which abandoned the territory. The conflict passed, then, to a war of attrition in the desert that Morocco – mainly with the help of France (Morocco’s former colonial metropolis and trading partner) – managed to hold on to Sahrawi cities in order to build a defensive wall protecting nearly 80% of the territory. In 1991, the exhausted parties agreed to commence negotiations to observe the due referendum of self-determination. But Morocco challenged the census prepared for this very purpose in 1999 by MINURSO. From this moment on, conversations have continued without any concrete progress towards the achievement of “a just and sustainable, mutually acceptable, political solution,” which would allow for the self-determination of the Sahrawi peoples in accordance with the UN Charter.
Human Rights – On Standby
Paradoxically, this stalemate of the negotiations has run in parallel to the emergence of human rights groups in Western Sahara cities, which denounce the grave human rights violations committed by the Moroccan Occupation Forces. The activities of these organizations have been harshly repressed by Morocco, to the point that in November 2009, the internationally-renowned Sahrawi defender of human rights Aminatu Haidar[7] was expelled from the territory. Haidar was able to return only after a long and painful hunger strike and effective pressure from the United States. [8]
Despite the ever-decreasing situation and Moroccan repression, the last resolutions in 2009 and 2010 of the Security Council regarding the territory have ignored the necessity to protect Sahrawi human rights. Instead, these resolutions have merely confirmed the importance of progressing in the “human dimensions” of the conflict, as if an analogy exists between the Sahrawi conflict and Europe during the Cold War.[9] Therefore, after the events of the Gdeim Yzik protest encampment, the new Security Council resolution regarding Western Sahara was expected with much anticipation.
The new resolution 1979/2011, like the previous resolutions, was pre-planned by France and Spain, as well as negotiated by the United States, to be finally adopted by the Security Council on April 27, 2011. Its content proves highly disappointing: the resolution does not amplify the MINURSO mandate to the supervision and monitoring of Sahrawis’ human rights. The resolution goes so far as to make an unsubstantiated claim to justify a concern for the human rights’ conditions as serious in the zone occupied by Morocco, as in the Algerian refugee camps where the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has an ample presence.
To guarantee the future amelioration of human rights for Sahrawis, the Security Council declares that the Resolution and the Security Council will welcome the establishment of a National Council for Human Rights by Morocco, complete with a special chamber dedicated to Western Sahara. This new institution merely renames the pre-existing and inefficient Advisory Council on Human Rights[10] created in 1990. The Resolution therefore does no more than implicitly recognize the competence of a public Moroccan institution in a territory outside of its sovereignty, subject to a still pending decolonisation process sponsored by the UN.
Moreover, the Resolution contains an irrelevant reference to the commitment of Morocco to ensure unconditional access – free of conditions and obstacles – to all the Special Procedures of the UN Advisory Council on Human Rights. This organ is not an objective nor independent institution, but rather it is of a political and inter-governmental nature, having been formed by the representatives of 47 states – including France and Spain – whose governments are characterised by minimal sensitivity to human rights violations of the Sahrawis, in addition to other states characterised by indifference towards human rights, such as China, Cuba, or Saudi Arabia. In this sense, it suffices to recall the Universal Periodic Review, to which Morocco was subject in 2008 by the UN Advisory Council on Human Rights, whose final report[11] solely recognised progress without once mentioning the dire situation, which already existed, in the occupied territory of Western Sahara.
Endorsing the Moroccan Monarchy
The icing on the cake of this Resolution is that – as a solution – it endorses the application of a refugee protection programme developed by the UNHCR in coordination with the Polisario Front. This programme, led by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), includes capacity-building and awareness-raising activities on human rights. However, and despite these initiatives, the Resolution does not require a similar and indispensable programme for the authorities and Moroccan Occupation Forces present in Western Sahara. Morocco is not part of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, nor of the Optional Protocol of the International Convention Against Torture, nor of the International Convention Against the Forced Disappearance of Persons. Morocco is supposed to respect the 1949 Geneva Conventions on International Human Rights, which requires occupying powers to respect the rights of the occupied.
Currently, the Security Council, with all its cynicism and the likely worsening of the situation, recently requested that the Secretary-General inform the Council regularly – “at least twice per annum” – of the progress in negotiations between parties. As pre-established by the OHCHR,[12] almost all the human rights violations committed in the occupied zone are consequence of the lack of application of the fundamental right to free self-determination of the Sahrawi people. What underlies this decision – just as in all the Security Council interventions on this issue since 1991 – is the clear intention to protect the stability of the Moroccan Monarchy, considered by the United States since its independence in 1956, as an essential ally against Communism previously and currently against fundamentalist Islam.
Nevertheless, this blind protectionism concerned with the abuses of a dictatorship is no way to guarantee for local or regional stability, but rather the complete opposite, as demonstrated by the fall of Ben Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt, as well as the mass protests in Syria, Jordan, Algeria, and of course Morocco. Since February 20, 2011, every month we have witnessed daily protests in major Moroccan cities calling for democracy and an end to the abuses of corruption. Mohammed VI and his entourage, pressured by their French partners, have not gone beyond a mere cosmetic reform of the system. The new constitution,[13] which just barely and superficially cut the king’s absolute powers, was approved in a recent referendum – as in previous elections. Barely 30% of the voting-age population participated due to abstention from leftists and fundamentalists, who are surprisingly united in all the claims of the “Arab Spring”.[14]
The Moroccan monarchy’s anecdotal reformism and the blind protection of the Security Council appear to move in the same direction: in the face of new challenges, and using the words of the Prince of Lampedusa in The Leopard, change so that nothing changes. Introducing a standard for democracy in institutions and speaking of human rights in resolutions regarding Western Sahara are always desirable – if, and only if, the effective control of the king and his political-economic-military entourage over Morocco and the Sahrawi territory and natural resources is not threatened. However, in both scenarios, the prudish and short-term strategy may soon be over-taken by events. The Arab people are taking their destiny into their own hands in opposition to the special interests of their oligarchies and the reductionist interests of the great powers.
Eduardo Trillo de Martín-Pinillos is associate professor at UNED in Public International Law, and a consultant for international organizations in human rights and democracy.
Alan Gignoux is a British photographer: www.gignouxphotos.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Report from the Moroccan Association for Human Rights on 24 December 2010.
[2] Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguía el Hamra y Río de Oro.
[3] United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara, MINURSO.
[4] Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Western Sahara, 16 October 1975.
[5] “Madrid Agreement,” 20 October 1975.
[6] UN Doc. S/2002/161.
[7] Human Rights Prize of the Robert F. Kennedy Foundation 2008 – Civil Courage Prize, Train Foundation, 2009.
[8] Eduardo Soto-Trillo, Viaje al abandono, Aguilar, 2011.
[9] The term “human dimension” was first used within the Conference for Security and Cooperation in Europe in Helsinki, 1975 to introduce human rights issues in the conversations. This was reflected in the final act of the conference.
[10] See Amnesty International annual reports, “Alliance for Dignity and Freedom,” Human Rights Watch, and the Moroccan Association for Human Rights, among others.
[11] A/HRC/8/22.
[12] Confidential report of the OHCHR, November 2006, the conclusions of which were, a posteriori, confirmed by a Human Rights Watch report in December 2008.
[13] Bernabé López García, “Marruecos. Cien Días para una nueva Constitución unanimidad para la galería y una”, Real Instituto Elcano, June 2011.
[14] Said Kirlhani, “Marruecos, la nueva constitución marroquí y el referéndum del 1 de julio”, Análisis del observatorio electoral TEIM, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, August 2011.
October 1, 2011 9:30 amadmin0 Comments
Resolution 1979 (2011) regarding the Western Sahara
Since December 2010, the so-called international community watches, unmoved, by the popular uprisings that have taken place in the Arab world. In the midst of a global economic crisis, these uprisings – hitherto unimaginable and unimagined – are the result of the desperation of societies in the face of entrenched corruption and the authoritarianism of regimes founded on oligarchies that seized power during their independence. Nevertheless, the revolutionary outbreak owes, without doubt, its rapid local and regional propagation to the expansion of communication amongst the youth (via Internet networks), which breaks the iron silence of information upon which such regimes were founded. The first achievement of this “Arab Spring” was the deposition of Ben Ali in Tunis. The trigger of his demise was the self-immolation of a young man haunted by his own future and the constant arrogance and humiliation of the regime.
However, the first warning signs of this tide of demonstrations took place in early October 2010, several thousand kilometres from the Mediterranean, in the extreme South-western point of the Arab world, in El-Aaiun – the capital of Western Sahara. Prohibited from demonstrating peacefully in the city streets, thousands of Sahrawis, dodging Moroccan occupation forces, pitched their tents in Gdeim Yzik – the middle of the desert – and protested for their lack of work and housing, and demanding their rights to sovereignty over the natural resources of their territory.
The Moroccan monarchy, overwhelmed by the magnitude of the events and the deterioration of its international image, reacted, making use of what has become a classic formula: first, expulsion of the international press to avoid uncomfortable testimonials, followed by the assault on and destruction of the encampment on November 8, 2011, followed by the detention, and disappearance of opposition leaders without due process. But this time, some members of the Moroccan Security Forces died along with protesters.
The young Sahrawis who lived in the zone of Western Sahara that is occupied by the Moroccans – desperate after waiting for a referendum allowing them to freely choose their future for more than 35 years – had lost the fear to die and faced the occupier, brandishing kitchen knives.[1] Meanwhile, in the Algerian refugee camps, the Polisario Front[2] (the Sahrawi Liberation Movement) had to calm its own, also desperate group that threatened to break the ceasefire and intervene on behalf of their brothers.
The Polisario – another oligarchy in power since the foundation of the Movement in 1972 – preferred to offer a new opportunity in the framework of negotiations established by the United Nations. They hoped that their gesture of good faith would be rewarded at the next Security Council resolution which reviews the conflict annually and would include the protection of human rights desired by MINURSO[3] – the sole UN peace mission without competencies in human rights.
Recall that Western Sahara is, according to the UN, “a non-autonomous territory,” that is to say, a colonial territory still awaiting decolonisation. In October 1975, the International Tribunal in The Hague rejected any and all sovereign rights of Morocco and Mauritania over the territory.[4] However, Spain – the administrative legal power – just a few days later, signed a treaty[5] with Morocco and Mauritania ceding administration and thus abandoning its responsibilities. Those agreements were never endorsed by the General Assembly and thus lack all legal effect at the international level. Confirmed by a UN legal report in 2002,[6] Morocco and Mauritania became the occupying powers of the Western Sahara in 1976 with the consent of Spain since it was the previous administrating power.
The war that ensued between the occupiers and the Polisario Front initially led to the defeat of Mauritania in 1979, which abandoned the territory. The conflict passed, then, to a war of attrition in the desert that Morocco – mainly with the help of France (Morocco’s former colonial metropolis and trading partner) – managed to hold on to Sahrawi cities in order to build a defensive wall protecting nearly 80% of the territory. In 1991, the exhausted parties agreed to commence negotiations to observe the due referendum of self-determination. But Morocco challenged the census prepared for this very purpose in 1999 by MINURSO. From this moment on, conversations have continued without any concrete progress towards the achievement of “a just and sustainable, mutually acceptable, political solution,” which would allow for the self-determination of the Sahrawi peoples in accordance with the UN Charter.
Human Rights – On Standby
Paradoxically, this stalemate of the negotiations has run in parallel to the emergence of human rights groups in Western Sahara cities, which denounce the grave human rights violations committed by the Moroccan Occupation Forces. The activities of these organizations have been harshly repressed by Morocco, to the point that in November 2009, the internationally-renowned Sahrawi defender of human rights Aminatu Haidar[7] was expelled from the territory. Haidar was able to return only after a long and painful hunger strike and effective pressure from the United States. [8]
Despite the ever-decreasing situation and Moroccan repression, the last resolutions in 2009 and 2010 of the Security Council regarding the territory have ignored the necessity to protect Sahrawi human rights. Instead, these resolutions have merely confirmed the importance of progressing in the “human dimensions” of the conflict, as if an analogy exists between the Sahrawi conflict and Europe during the Cold War.[9] Therefore, after the events of the Gdeim Yzik protest encampment, the new Security Council resolution regarding Western Sahara was expected with much anticipation.
The new resolution 1979/2011, like the previous resolutions, was pre-planned by France and Spain, as well as negotiated by the United States, to be finally adopted by the Security Council on April 27, 2011. Its content proves highly disappointing: the resolution does not amplify the MINURSO mandate to the supervision and monitoring of Sahrawis’ human rights. The resolution goes so far as to make an unsubstantiated claim to justify a concern for the human rights’ conditions as serious in the zone occupied by Morocco, as in the Algerian refugee camps where the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has an ample presence.
To guarantee the future amelioration of human rights for Sahrawis, the Security Council declares that the Resolution and the Security Council will welcome the establishment of a National Council for Human Rights by Morocco, complete with a special chamber dedicated to Western Sahara. This new institution merely renames the pre-existing and inefficient Advisory Council on Human Rights[10] created in 1990. The Resolution therefore does no more than implicitly recognize the competence of a public Moroccan institution in a territory outside of its sovereignty, subject to a still pending decolonisation process sponsored by the UN.
Moreover, the Resolution contains an irrelevant reference to the commitment of Morocco to ensure unconditional access – free of conditions and obstacles – to all the Special Procedures of the UN Advisory Council on Human Rights. This organ is not an objective nor independent institution, but rather it is of a political and inter-governmental nature, having been formed by the representatives of 47 states – including France and Spain – whose governments are characterised by minimal sensitivity to human rights violations of the Sahrawis, in addition to other states characterised by indifference towards human rights, such as China, Cuba, or Saudi Arabia. In this sense, it suffices to recall the Universal Periodic Review, to which Morocco was subject in 2008 by the UN Advisory Council on Human Rights, whose final report[11] solely recognised progress without once mentioning the dire situation, which already existed, in the occupied territory of Western Sahara.
Endorsing the Moroccan Monarchy
The icing on the cake of this Resolution is that – as a solution – it endorses the application of a refugee protection programme developed by the UNHCR in coordination with the Polisario Front. This programme, led by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), includes capacity-building and awareness-raising activities on human rights. However, and despite these initiatives, the Resolution does not require a similar and indispensable programme for the authorities and Moroccan Occupation Forces present in Western Sahara. Morocco is not part of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, nor of the Optional Protocol of the International Convention Against Torture, nor of the International Convention Against the Forced Disappearance of Persons. Morocco is supposed to respect the 1949 Geneva Conventions on International Human Rights, which requires occupying powers to respect the rights of the occupied.
Currently, the Security Council, with all its cynicism and the likely worsening of the situation, recently requested that the Secretary-General inform the Council regularly – “at least twice per annum” – of the progress in negotiations between parties. As pre-established by the OHCHR,[12] almost all the human rights violations committed in the occupied zone are consequence of the lack of application of the fundamental right to free self-determination of the Sahrawi people. What underlies this decision – just as in all the Security Council interventions on this issue since 1991 – is the clear intention to protect the stability of the Moroccan Monarchy, considered by the United States since its independence in 1956, as an essential ally against Communism previously and currently against fundamentalist Islam.
Nevertheless, this blind protectionism concerned with the abuses of a dictatorship is no way to guarantee for local or regional stability, but rather the complete opposite, as demonstrated by the fall of Ben Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt, as well as the mass protests in Syria, Jordan, Algeria, and of course Morocco. Since February 20, 2011, every month we have witnessed daily protests in major Moroccan cities calling for democracy and an end to the abuses of corruption. Mohammed VI and his entourage, pressured by their French partners, have not gone beyond a mere cosmetic reform of the system. The new constitution,[13] which just barely and superficially cut the king’s absolute powers, was approved in a recent referendum – as in previous elections. Barely 30% of the voting-age population participated due to abstention from leftists and fundamentalists, who are surprisingly united in all the claims of the “Arab Spring”.[14]
The Moroccan monarchy’s anecdotal reformism and the blind protection of the Security Council appear to move in the same direction: in the face of new challenges, and using the words of the Prince of Lampedusa in The Leopard, change so that nothing changes. Introducing a standard for democracy in institutions and speaking of human rights in resolutions regarding Western Sahara are always desirable – if, and only if, the effective control of the king and his political-economic-military entourage over Morocco and the Sahrawi territory and natural resources is not threatened. However, in both scenarios, the prudish and short-term strategy may soon be over-taken by events. The Arab people are taking their destiny into their own hands in opposition to the special interests of their oligarchies and the reductionist interests of the great powers.
Eduardo Trillo de Martín-Pinillos is associate professor at UNED in Public International Law, and a consultant for international organizations in human rights and democracy.
Alan Gignoux is a British photographer: www.gignouxphotos.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Report from the Moroccan Association for Human Rights on 24 December 2010.
[2] Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguía el Hamra y Río de Oro.
[3] United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara, MINURSO.
[4] Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Western Sahara, 16 October 1975.
[5] “Madrid Agreement,” 20 October 1975.
[6] UN Doc. S/2002/161.
[7] Human Rights Prize of the Robert F. Kennedy Foundation 2008 – Civil Courage Prize, Train Foundation, 2009.
[8] Eduardo Soto-Trillo, Viaje al abandono, Aguilar, 2011.
[9] The term “human dimension” was first used within the Conference for Security and Cooperation in Europe in Helsinki, 1975 to introduce human rights issues in the conversations. This was reflected in the final act of the conference.
[10] See Amnesty International annual reports, “Alliance for Dignity and Freedom,” Human Rights Watch, and the Moroccan Association for Human Rights, among others.
[11] A/HRC/8/22.
[12] Confidential report of the OHCHR, November 2006, the conclusions of which were, a posteriori, confirmed by a Human Rights Watch report in December 2008.
[13] Bernabé López García, “Marruecos. Cien Días para una nueva Constitución unanimidad para la galería y una”, Real Instituto Elcano, June 2011.
[14] Said Kirlhani, “Marruecos, la nueva constitución marroquí y el referéndum del 1 de julio”, Análisis del observatorio electoral TEIM, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, August 2011.
2011: the year of Facebook revolutions … some forgotten and ignored
The occupation of Wall Street began in the deserts of Western Sahara and this weekend it will spread to our Australian cities.
In El-Ayoun, Moroccan controlled Western Sahara, in the Gdeim Izik refugee tent camp, a demonstration was set up by Saharawis as a form of protest in October-November 2010.
Western Sahara has been occupied illegally by Morocco since 1975. The situation is similar to Indonesia’s invasion of East Timor.
The attack on Gdeim Izik
The UN is responsible for organizing a referendum, although Morocco has succeeded in derailing its implementation.
France, the US and the international community have also looked the other way.
The Moroccan government’s response to the Gdeim Izik refugee camp was swift and brutal.
While Polisario, the Western Sahara liberation movement, claimed that 36 Saharawis were killed, hundreds wounded and 163 arrested, the Moroccan government argued that only 2 demonstrators but 11 Moroccan security forces had been killed.
The only filmed representation of this occupation exists on Youtube.
The first shot of the Arab Spring
According to Noam Chomsky the Arab Spring began not in Tunisia but in Western Sahara at Gdeim Izik.
Kamal Fadel, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Front representative in Australia, argues that there were no journalists in the protest camp. The revolution wasn’t tweeted, says Fadel.
One week ago, on September 25, a peaceful Sahrawi demonstration followed violent and fatal football clashes between Saharawis and Moroccan settlers.
The demonstration was violently repressed by the Moroccan authorities and another Sahrawi was killed. In both Gdeim Izik and Dahkla, we can only try to reconstruct what happened through eyewitness testimonies and online media.
The Facebook revolution you haven’t heard of
Exiled human rights activist Aicha Dahane, who toured Australia earlier this year, has stated that because of extreme repression, the only media platform available to the Saharawis is online and Youtube and Facebook are the most popular.
And while there has been a Facebook Revolution in Western Sahara, as I argue here, it has been largely forgotten.
Gdeim Izik and Wall Street; Western Sahara and the Arab Spring: the relationship between events is beginning to resemble online mirror sites.
When the Wikileaks site was hacked late last year many others stepped up and reproduced the information trail endlessly by introducing their own sites. If 2011 is the year of revolutions the connections are often new, unexpected and exciting.
Dahane also spoke about the solidarity and sharing of food and possessions that was emblematic of the Gdeim Izik tent camp.
When the Net goes down
It reminded me of Ahdif Soueif’s introduction to the little gem of a book Tweets From Tahrir from cutting edge publisher OR books:
“Tahrir was a space of unity, pride, resistance, celebration, laughter, sharing, and most importantly ownership. This was the people’s space; our rules and our demands. We would not leave until justice was born.”
When the internet was blocked in Egypt social media was forced to take a back-seat. The action was now on the streets.
It was no longer simply viral. People could meet face-to-face while before they shielded themselves behind the internet screen. This is the place where Facebook becomes redundant.
From Harvard to the Sahara to the White House
While Facebook was founded in the mainstream American college circuit nobody could have predicted its radical role in Western Sahara and Egypt. If we trace the life cycle of Facebook we can say that it is now all grown up.
It’s now tired of the all night decadent parties as epitomised in the myth-making film The Social Network. It now wants to get political; or at least, organize its staff to do so.
Following on from the example of Google it now plans to encourage its employees to donate to a political action committee.
Facebook’s political action committee “will give our employees a way to make their voice heard in the political process by supporting candidates who share our goals of promoting the value of innovation to our economy while giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected.”
Facebook is functioning like any other corporation in Washington, employing its own lobbyists to promote what Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman call spin and flak, one of the filters used by the corporate media and its lobbyists to manufacture consent in industrialised societies.
Who needs who?
Openness, in Facebook’s definition, is a form of spin and a not too unsophisticated means of getting one’s own way.
The Occupy Wall Street movement is one of the most recent sustained challenges to corporate greed and unbridled corporate influence, including media monopolies.
“We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments,” argues the Declaration of the Occupation of New York City.
One of the current great ironies is that the Wall Street occupiers need Facebook as an information tool now more than Facebook, with its corporate lobbyists, needs them.
And when, like the Egyptian protesters in Tahrir Square, the Occupy Wall Street movement is consolidated on the streets Facebook could find it has become the corporate target
In El-Ayoun, Moroccan controlled Western Sahara, in the Gdeim Izik refugee tent camp, a demonstration was set up by Saharawis as a form of protest in October-November 2010.
Western Sahara has been occupied illegally by Morocco since 1975. The situation is similar to Indonesia’s invasion of East Timor.
The attack on Gdeim Izik
The UN is responsible for organizing a referendum, although Morocco has succeeded in derailing its implementation.
France, the US and the international community have also looked the other way.
The Moroccan government’s response to the Gdeim Izik refugee camp was swift and brutal.
While Polisario, the Western Sahara liberation movement, claimed that 36 Saharawis were killed, hundreds wounded and 163 arrested, the Moroccan government argued that only 2 demonstrators but 11 Moroccan security forces had been killed.
The only filmed representation of this occupation exists on Youtube.
The first shot of the Arab Spring
According to Noam Chomsky the Arab Spring began not in Tunisia but in Western Sahara at Gdeim Izik.
Kamal Fadel, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Front representative in Australia, argues that there were no journalists in the protest camp. The revolution wasn’t tweeted, says Fadel.
One week ago, on September 25, a peaceful Sahrawi demonstration followed violent and fatal football clashes between Saharawis and Moroccan settlers.
The demonstration was violently repressed by the Moroccan authorities and another Sahrawi was killed. In both Gdeim Izik and Dahkla, we can only try to reconstruct what happened through eyewitness testimonies and online media.
The Facebook revolution you haven’t heard of
Exiled human rights activist Aicha Dahane, who toured Australia earlier this year, has stated that because of extreme repression, the only media platform available to the Saharawis is online and Youtube and Facebook are the most popular.
And while there has been a Facebook Revolution in Western Sahara, as I argue here, it has been largely forgotten.
Gdeim Izik and Wall Street; Western Sahara and the Arab Spring: the relationship between events is beginning to resemble online mirror sites.
When the Wikileaks site was hacked late last year many others stepped up and reproduced the information trail endlessly by introducing their own sites. If 2011 is the year of revolutions the connections are often new, unexpected and exciting.
Dahane also spoke about the solidarity and sharing of food and possessions that was emblematic of the Gdeim Izik tent camp.
When the Net goes down
It reminded me of Ahdif Soueif’s introduction to the little gem of a book Tweets From Tahrir from cutting edge publisher OR books:
“Tahrir was a space of unity, pride, resistance, celebration, laughter, sharing, and most importantly ownership. This was the people’s space; our rules and our demands. We would not leave until justice was born.”
When the internet was blocked in Egypt social media was forced to take a back-seat. The action was now on the streets.
It was no longer simply viral. People could meet face-to-face while before they shielded themselves behind the internet screen. This is the place where Facebook becomes redundant.
From Harvard to the Sahara to the White House
While Facebook was founded in the mainstream American college circuit nobody could have predicted its radical role in Western Sahara and Egypt. If we trace the life cycle of Facebook we can say that it is now all grown up.
It’s now tired of the all night decadent parties as epitomised in the myth-making film The Social Network. It now wants to get political; or at least, organize its staff to do so.
Following on from the example of Google it now plans to encourage its employees to donate to a political action committee.
Facebook’s political action committee “will give our employees a way to make their voice heard in the political process by supporting candidates who share our goals of promoting the value of innovation to our economy while giving people the power to share and make the world more open and connected.”
Facebook is functioning like any other corporation in Washington, employing its own lobbyists to promote what Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman call spin and flak, one of the filters used by the corporate media and its lobbyists to manufacture consent in industrialised societies.
Who needs who?
Openness, in Facebook’s definition, is a form of spin and a not too unsophisticated means of getting one’s own way.
The Occupy Wall Street movement is one of the most recent sustained challenges to corporate greed and unbridled corporate influence, including media monopolies.
“We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments,” argues the Declaration of the Occupation of New York City.
One of the current great ironies is that the Wall Street occupiers need Facebook as an information tool now more than Facebook, with its corporate lobbyists, needs them.
And when, like the Egyptian protesters in Tahrir Square, the Occupy Wall Street movement is consolidated on the streets Facebook could find it has become the corporate target
Monday, September 26, 2011
Another Saharawi Victim falls down in Dakhla: A New Martyr
الذى استشهد يوم 26-09-2011
اثناء المواجهات و الاحداث التى شهدتها مدينة الداخلة المحتلة على اثر الهجوم الذى قامت به الاجهزة الامنية المغربية مدعومة بالمستوطنين ضد المواطنين الصحراويين العزل
اسم الشهيد
ميشان ولد محمد لمين ولد لحبيب ابوه معروف باسم باريز
اسم الام عيشة منت احميادة
تاريخ الازدياد 1982 بمخيمات العزة والكرامة
Friday, July 22, 2011
Coming Crisis in Phosphate Supplies
Coming Crisis in Phosphate Supplies
Written by David Gabel
Wednesday, 20 July 2011 12:22
Message :Investors: Free Oil Industry Investment Report - Our Fracking industry guide shows you the strategies that will enable you to generate excellent returns in what will be one of the most profitable sectors of the energy industry. Click here for your Free report.
Phosphate is a mineral that is used in fertilizer to boost agricultural productivity. It is greatly responsible for the "green" revolution and the increased output of farms around the world. Unfortunately, the world will be coming to a point, if certain trends hold, where we will run out of phosphate. The mineral is widely used, but utterly unrecycled. Like fossil fuels, phosphate may come to a point where it is too costly to use, and world hunger may be the consequence.
Phosphate is an inorganic chemical mined from the earth. It typically consists of one phosphorus atom surrounded by oxygen atoms. The addition of phosphates can have a huge impact to an ecosystem. Like water and air, it is literally essential to life on Earth. On cropland, it can greatly boost yields. However, from there it usually drains into waterways. In freshwater and marine environments, it acts as a limiting nutrient, often causing eutrophication (oxygen deprived water).
The largest reserve of phosphate rock can be found in the country of Western Sahara, just south of Morocco. Once a Spanish colony, it is now controlled by Morocco. One of the reasons the Moroccans are so interested is thought to be the vast phosphate reserves. The mines are at Bou Craa which produces several million tons of phosphate rock each year. It gets transferred down a huge 150-kilometer long conveyor belt to the Atlantic port of El Ayoun.
Farmers around the world use about 170 million tons of phosphate every year to keep their soils fertile. One ton of phosphate is typically used for every 130 tons of grain. Fifteen percent of all phosphate comes from Western Sahara and Morocco. The other big producers are the US and China which each use up their own. This makes Western Sahara and Morocco the biggest players in the international phosphate trade. The biggest nations which rely on this trade are India and Brazil which may be starving otherwise.
According to the US Geological Survey, the world has 65 billion tons of known phosphate reserves, but only 16 billion tons that are economically viable to mine. Almost 80 percent are found in Western Sahara and Morocco. The US, with only 1.4 billion tons, may run out soon, causing alarm among agronomists. Academic researcher, Dana Cordell, of the Global Phosphorus Research Initiative, has predicted that we could reach "peak phosphorus" production by 2030.
There are no substitutes for phosphate. On the other hand, the other vital nutrient for plants, nitrogen, can be found from a number of sources. It can be fixed from the atmosphere thanks to German chemist Fritz Haber. Phosphate cannot be fixed from anything. It must be mined and the mines are going to run out. Unless a solution can be found, the long term consequences may be lower yield crops and a hungrier world.
By. David Gabel
Source: Environmental News Network
http://oilprice.com/Metals/Commodities/The-Coming-Crisis-in-Phosphate-Supplies.html
Written by David Gabel
Wednesday, 20 July 2011 12:22
Message :Investors: Free Oil Industry Investment Report - Our Fracking industry guide shows you the strategies that will enable you to generate excellent returns in what will be one of the most profitable sectors of the energy industry. Click here for your Free report.
Phosphate is a mineral that is used in fertilizer to boost agricultural productivity. It is greatly responsible for the "green" revolution and the increased output of farms around the world. Unfortunately, the world will be coming to a point, if certain trends hold, where we will run out of phosphate. The mineral is widely used, but utterly unrecycled. Like fossil fuels, phosphate may come to a point where it is too costly to use, and world hunger may be the consequence.
Phosphate is an inorganic chemical mined from the earth. It typically consists of one phosphorus atom surrounded by oxygen atoms. The addition of phosphates can have a huge impact to an ecosystem. Like water and air, it is literally essential to life on Earth. On cropland, it can greatly boost yields. However, from there it usually drains into waterways. In freshwater and marine environments, it acts as a limiting nutrient, often causing eutrophication (oxygen deprived water).
The largest reserve of phosphate rock can be found in the country of Western Sahara, just south of Morocco. Once a Spanish colony, it is now controlled by Morocco. One of the reasons the Moroccans are so interested is thought to be the vast phosphate reserves. The mines are at Bou Craa which produces several million tons of phosphate rock each year. It gets transferred down a huge 150-kilometer long conveyor belt to the Atlantic port of El Ayoun.
Farmers around the world use about 170 million tons of phosphate every year to keep their soils fertile. One ton of phosphate is typically used for every 130 tons of grain. Fifteen percent of all phosphate comes from Western Sahara and Morocco. The other big producers are the US and China which each use up their own. This makes Western Sahara and Morocco the biggest players in the international phosphate trade. The biggest nations which rely on this trade are India and Brazil which may be starving otherwise.
According to the US Geological Survey, the world has 65 billion tons of known phosphate reserves, but only 16 billion tons that are economically viable to mine. Almost 80 percent are found in Western Sahara and Morocco. The US, with only 1.4 billion tons, may run out soon, causing alarm among agronomists. Academic researcher, Dana Cordell, of the Global Phosphorus Research Initiative, has predicted that we could reach "peak phosphorus" production by 2030.
There are no substitutes for phosphate. On the other hand, the other vital nutrient for plants, nitrogen, can be found from a number of sources. It can be fixed from the atmosphere thanks to German chemist Fritz Haber. Phosphate cannot be fixed from anything. It must be mined and the mines are going to run out. Unless a solution can be found, the long term consequences may be lower yield crops and a hungrier world.
By. David Gabel
Source: Environmental News Network
http://oilprice.com/Metals/Commodities/The-Coming-Crisis-in-Phosphate-Supplies.html
Friday, June 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)